Attorney for In Propria Persona SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
|
|||
|
GREG DIAMOND, an individual Gentile hatter,
Plaintiff, vs. STANLEY FIALA, an individual; Gentiles; Slavs; DOES 1 trough 1,000,006, inclusive, Defendants |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
Case No.
Moot
Assigned to Honorable Fuckestain VERIFIED COMPLAINT Date: February 21, 2013 Time: any a.m. Dept: 666 |
|
PRELIMINARY MATTERS OF FACT AND MATTERS OF LAWAPPLICABLE TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION
(I am a Jew who hates Gentiles and anyone who hates me
is antisemitic)
“What the world needs now is less Jewish NWO politically correct censorship and politically correct infringing on the American Bill of Rights.” Wow. Personally, I think that what the world needs now is fewer asshole bigots. If you were trying to offer a critique of Israeli policy, of unquestioning US support for Israel, etc., I’d likely agree with much of it — well, if it came from someone not disposed towards conspiracy theory as you are. But this isn’t about the Middle East, it’s about Jews like me supposedly trying to take away guns and oppress others. That’s bigotry. You just made Stanley very happy — I won’t give a grotesque description of it — and I hope that he contacts you, his new ally. I know that “NWO” stands for “New World Order,” so I decided to see if “Jewish NWO” was a vogue phrase or just something you made up. Here’s what I found through Google (no links, just search result headlines and occasionally a snippet, because I’m not linking to this stuff):
“Down with the Jewish NWO – YouTube” “London to Remove ‘Anti-Semitic’ Mural Showing … –
Before It’s News “Rabbi Marvin Antleman–Father of Jewish NWO Study”
|
|||
I think I’ll stop there, but Google says that there’s 4700 in total. (Now 4701, I guess, thanks to you.) That’s your peer group now. Beware, they don’t like Mexicans (or even half-Mexicans) either. I hadn’t expected this of you, but I suppose that that was my mistake. Have fun playing with Stanislaw. Anyone else here want to come out of this particular closet? You have in mind something you and others call the “Jewish NWO” (“New World Order”). Not just a “new world order” — a term that both Hitler and one of the Presidents Bush employed — but a particular Jewish one. If you meant support for Israel, then I’d have to admit that a lot of Jews (though not necessarily a majority) feel strongly about that, be they write or wrong, and a lot of politicians cater to their preferences. But you don’t: you talk about “Jewish NWO” being “politically correct censorship and politically correct infringing on the American Bill of Rights.” This racially-based conspiracy about a minority group trying to impede your rights puts you in some longstanding and vile company; maybe you’re heard the phrase “Anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools.” Your expressed concern above is what “people of that persuasion are doing within American politics and World politics.” Really? It bothers you more if Jews are doing something you dislike in politics than if other people are doing that thing? Why is that? If you had just described what you dislike as a “New World Order of politically correct censorship …” etc. then I would have either considered it on its merits or brushed it off with an eye-roll (having considered it on its merits already.) But you didn’t — you racialized the attack. You can search your own soul as to why you did so and how that fits with your self-perception as “NOT a BIGOT.” You might start by asking yourself what if anything you think is wrong with Fiala’s commentaries on Jews. I presume that there is probably some analogy to anti-Latino bigotry that might get the point across to you, but I’m not going to go looking for it — because I don’t particularly want to find it, and if I found it, I don’t particularly want to publish it. Awesome: As usual, the Bloviator spews his shit on something he’s clueless about. You would’ve shamed the Cloaca Maxima with the amount of effluvia your brain emits. Breaking news, everyone: Asshole anti-Semitic bigot is still asshole anti-Semitic bigot! No more of your comments will be approved on this story, Stalinslav. You’ve had your say. My guess is: the Brazilian with German roots, who will choose the name “Pius.” Wouldn’t be surprised by the Milanese Scalo, either,
in which case I’ll guess “Paul.”
"I’m not Catholic, though I’m married into a Catholic
family and am still on great terms with my Catholic
former in-laws, but to the extent I have the right to
an opinion I’m very pleased with this choice"..........
Hmmm Sounds familiar?
|